Broadwoven Fabric Finishing Mills

Industry Summary

Over the past 5 years this industry has recorded an accident rate of over 2 times (-100% more) the average for the Textile and Fabric Finishing Mills Industry.

On Tuesday, June 16th 2015 OSHA reps took a report of a serious accident in El Paso, TX at Ruddock Manufacturing Company. A had been injured when the other fall to lower level 6 to 10 feet
Accident Date2015-06-12
Accident DegreeInjury
NarrativeAn employee in the warehouse fell from a pallet tier that was approximately 7 feet high and fractured their left ankle.
OSHA investigators arrived in Los Angeles, CA on Tuesday, September 10th 2013 and began an accident investigation after learning of an incident at Washington Garment Dyeing And Finishing Inc which had occured on Thursday, July 11th 2013. A employee working as a employee was injured on the job when the employee's fingered are injured in threading machine
OSHA ID202545588
Accident Date2013-07-11
Accident DegreeHospitalized injury
NarrativeAt approximately 12:00 p.m. on July 11, 2013, Employee #1 and a coworker worked to grease a rigid pipe threading machine. They started by removing the cover for the gears and applying grease with a grease gun as the machine was energized. While Employee #1 and his coworker worked to service the machine, the machine was not stopped and the power source was not deenergized. Additionally, Employee #1 was wearing gloves made of cloth and suede. The coworker activated the machine by depressing the machine's foot pedal. Employee #1's gloved fingers were caught on the gears of the machine and pulled into the machine, which fractured multiple fingers and amputated one fingertip. Employee #1 was hospitalized for three days where he received surgery to close the amputated finger and pins to repair the phalangeal fractures.
OSHA investigators arrived in Travelers Rest, SC on Wednesday, April 10th 2013 and began an accident investigation after learning of an incident at Aurora Specialties Textiles Group which had occured on Monday, April 1st 2013. A employee working as a employee was injured on the job when the maintenance worker injured when dyeing vessel explodes
OSHA ID200376309
Accident Date2013-04-01
Accident DegreeHospitalized injury
NarrativeAt approximately 2:30 p.m. on April 1, 2013, Employee #1 was working as a member of a maintenance crew in a factory at which textiles were produced. At the time of the incident, a coworker was working as the operator of dyeing equipment in the factory. He was performing his daily job of monitoring and running the three jig dyeing vessels located in the dyeing area of the factory. While examining the pressure gauge located on the vessel, he noticed that Jig Number 2 was operating at a pressure higher than the normal operating pressure. Jig Number 2 was constructed by the Gaston County Dyeing Machine Company. It had been sold to the textile factory through Zimmer America Corporation. Jig Number 2 consisted of, but was not limited to, several systems. These included a kier, heat exchanger, smaller mixing vessels, a control panel, a pump, and a motor. The way to open the kier for Jig Number 2 was to move the kier along a track on the floor so that the vessel could be loaded with rolls of material before it was closed. Jig Number 2 was running a typical dyeing cycle. This involved running a long roll of cloth or polyester through an internal dyeing bath at a high temperature to quicken the dyeing process. The roll being processed at the time of the incident was 10 to 12 feet wide and 250 yards long (3.0 to 3.7 meters wide and 229 meters long). The chemicals, temperature, and time it took to dye the roll of cloth or polyester mix depended on the desired end product. The normal operating pressure was between 30 and 35 psi (207 and 241 kPa, or 2.10 and 2.40 bars). At the time of the incident, the operating temperature was approximately 275 degrees Fahrenheit (135 degrees Celsius), and the process was in approximately its second hour. The entire dyeing process takes approximately four hours. The operator called the maintenance department in order to report the high pressure. Two maintenance personnel responded to the call from the operator and arrived at Jig Number 2. Employee #1 was one of them. After the maintenance personnel arrived, the operator stepped away from the machine to attend to other job duties. Employee #1 and his maintenance coworker began examining Jig Number 2. They discovered that the light for "Module Number 7" was illuminated. Employee #1 decided to return to the maintenance shop in order to obtain and review the schematics to begin troubleshooting Jig Number 2. The second maintenance worker stepped away from Jig Number 2 as well and went to check on another area of the facility. Employee #1 returned to Jig Number 2 with the schematics. He was standing approximately 15 feet (4.6 meters) away on the operator side of the vessel, when Jig Number 2 exploded from the overpressurization. Employee #1 was knocked to the floor. He received first- and second-degree burns on his arms and abdomen. He also sustained the dislocation of his left shoulder. The fire department and police force responded to the incident, and emergency responders took Employee #1 in an ambulance to the hospital. No other personnel were injured in the explosion. The facility lost power in the immediate area. Other machinery, next to Jig Number 2, was damaged due to the explosion and flying parts. One structural support beam was bent due to the movement of the machinery from the explosion. The kier portion of Jig Number 2, which moves along the track to open, was pushed off its track and into machinery located behind the original location of Jig Number 2. The neighboring machinery stopped the movement of the kier. The rest of Jig Number 2, which included, but was not limited to, the lid of the kier, control panel, mixing vessels, and motor, was pushed toward the front area of Jig Number 2. The lid of the kier and the control panel, though structurally braced into the concrete of the facility, were pushed by the explosion with enough force to remove them from the brace. The lid of the kier, control pan

OSHA Inspection Activity

Accident Rate

5 Year Average
0
Last 12 Months
0

Reporting Statistics

Inspection Records: 167
Inspection Rate:
Violation Records:
Accident Records: 5

Common Tools/Equipment

Injured Body Part

Task being performed